Breath Test Results

September 5, 2010

Husband of ‘Real Housewives’ Star Giudice Gets Reduced Sentence after Montville Drunk Driving Arrest

Whether it’s Snookie, Lindsay Lohan, Mel Gibson or any number of other famous personalities who have a little too much to drink, drunk driving and other traffic and civil offenses are not limited to the television screen. Not long ago, the husband of reality TV star Teresa Giudice (of ”Real Housewives of New Jersey” fame) apparently made a somewhat successful appeal after deciding to fight court-ordered penalties following his conviction for a DWI offense in Montville, NJ, early this year.

As a New Jersey defense attorney who represents motorists charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, as well as drugs, I and my colleagues understand state and local laws pertaining to individuals arrested for drunken driving throughout the Garden State.

According to recent news articles, Teresa Giudice’s husband apparently received a reduction in the penalties following an appeal from an earlier drunken driving arrest. Based on reports, a Superior Court judge substantially cut the various penalties that Giuseppe ”Joe” Giudice faced after a March DWI hearing in Montville Municipal Court.

August 24, 2010

NJ Drunk Driving Defense News: Police Must Read Suspected DWI Offenders Instructions in Native Language

by Jonathan F. Marshall

When it comes to drunken driving arrests, police agencies all across New Jersey are now required to give instruction to DWI suspects in a language they can understand. The latest change in police procedures as they apply to drunk driving offenders is a result of a July decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court.

The Court’s 4-3 ruling on July 12 states that patrolmen must now communicate to a motorist suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol in a language that he or she understands that they are required under the law to submit to a breathalyzer test to determine blood-alcohol content (BAC).

The downside from a drunk driving defense standpoint is that this new requirement will likely reduce the opportunities for appeals, according to some law enforcement professionals.

August 21, 2010

New Jersey Drunk Driving News: Bergen County DWI and Drug DUI Police Blotter

by Jonathan F. Marshall

LyndhurstA 56-year-old out-of-state woman was arrested and charged with DWI after she apparently left the scene of a minor accident. According to police reports, officers were called to the scene of a motor vehicle accident on a late Monday afternoon, from which one of the drivers had subsequently left. At nearly the same time, police received reports of an allegedly intoxicated person in a Quality Inn parking lot across the street from the accident. The woman was taken into custody and eventually released on summonses.

East Rutherford

A 21-year-old Weehawken, NJ, female resident was stopped by police after officers observed the driver make a U-turn along New Jersey’s Route 120 and in the process hit the center divider of the highway. After pulling over the suspect’s car police determined that the woman was apparently intoxicated. Officers noticed a plastic bag in the vehicle, which the driver eventually identified as containing marijuana. She also admitted to police that she had planned to sell the controlled dangerous substance (CDS). The woman was arrested and charged with multiple violations including possession of CDS under 50 grams and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute.

August 3, 2010

New Jersey DWI News: Driver Charged with Drunk Driving had 0.33 BAC Level

by Jonathan F. Marshall

As I’ve said here before, DWI arrests can happen anywhere, not just on a highway or city street. As a New Jersey drunk driving defense lawyer, I have represented motorists who have been accused of drinking and driving in nearly any situation imaginable. And since I have experience as a former municipal prosecutor, I have approached cases from the law enforcement side as well.

Whatever the venue, New Jersey law prohibits driving while under the influence of alcohol, prescription drug, or other substance that causes physical and mental impairment. A recent news article illustrates how anyone can get a drunk driving summons even while sitting in a parking lot.

Based on police reports, an off-duty Middle Township patrolman observed what she believed to be person under the influence of alcohol sitting in a vehicle in the Acme Plaza Shopping center in Cape May Court House, NJ. Calling the situation into the local police headquarters, she was able to wrest the keys away from the driver who was apparently attempting to flee the scene. A uniformed officer arrived who had just ended his shoft for the day responded to help.

July 25, 2010

New Jersey DWI Defense Update: Considering the Differences Bewteen Drug DUI and Drunk Driving Cases

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Drunk driving arrests can happen anywhere, anytime. In the Garden State, state police and local law enforcement agencies have little tolerance for motorists who drive while under the influence of alcohol, prescription drugs and, and illicit and illegal drugs (also known as controlled dangerous substances, or CDS).

As a New Jersey drunk driving defense lawyer, I and my staff have vast experience defending drivers accused of operating a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol or drugs. In fact, it is common for drunken driving charges to be brought against an individual who is suspected of driving under the influence of drugs (also known as DUID). These include but are not necessarily limited to narcotic, hallucinogenic, or habit-forming substances.

It is important to understand also that New Jersey law prohibits driving if a person is impaired by marijuana, cocaine, or other narcotics — which even includes prescription drugs such as morphine. For legal purposes, the standard of proof used to establish a narcotic-based DWI charge has been established in the 2006 court case of State v. Bealor. Furthermore, in State v. DiCarlo, the law actually defines the term narcotic — for the specific purpose of establishing a basis for driving while intoxicated charges here in New Jersey.

July 11, 2010

New Jersey DWI Defense News: Essex County, NJ, Drunk Driving and Drug DUI Police Blotter

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Defending motorists accused of drunken driving can involve multiple factors, such as how the arrest was conducted, whether or not an Alcotest or other breathalyzer blood-alcohol content (BAC) test was performed, what kind of field sobriety test(s) were administered, and in which municipality the alleged DWI took place. As New Jersey drunk driving defense lawyers, my staff and fellow attorneys understand the ins and outs of DWI prosecution here in the Garden State. The following are some examples of the types of cases that are heard daily in our municipal courtrooms across the state.

Little Falls Car Crash and DWI, Marijuana Possession Arrest

Little Falls police officers were called to respond to a traffic accident on Main Street near Brookside Ave. According to news reports, a motor vehicle driven by a 19-year-old Fairfield, NJ, resident apparently ran into a utility pole. During the investigation, officers noticed that the driver had outward signs of being drunk and under the influence of alcohol. The driver was arrested for operating a vehicle while intoxicated as well as possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia in a vehicle.

June 23, 2010

New Jersey DWI Update: Drunk Driving Enforcement Extends to Boaters on Jersey Coastline, Inland Waterways

by Jonathan F. Marshall

When it comes to driving under the influence of alcohol on New Jersey’s public roads, “tolerance” is by no means a word found in the vocabulary of the state’s law enforcement community. Similarly the state has no patience for drinking and piloting a boat along the Garden State’s coastline, its lakes or rivers and estuaries. DWI on the high seas, so to speak is just as serious an offense as here on land.

What’s surprising is that boat owners don’t always consider that the same standards which govern drinking and driving on public roads also apply to the operation of watercraft. Boaters must observe the same drunken driving laws as car, motorcycle and truck owners. Because of this, individuals who violate the DWI laws while boating are also subject to arrest for driving while intoxicated. And also included with this are those related offenses, such as prescription drug DUI and breath test refusal when the operator of a boat has a blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) in excess of 0.08 percent.

New Jersey’s statutes governing operation of a boat while under the influence of alcohol or drugs are nearly identical to those that pertain to DWI with a motor vehicle. The penalties are also closely related. The implied consent laws that oblige a licensed driver to submit to a breath or blood test following a drunk driving stop also applies to the operator of a watercraft in New Jersey.

June 18, 2010

New Jersey Drunk Driving Defense Update: Cigarette Smoking May Cause Higher BAC Breathalyzer Reading

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Many people confronted with a first-time arrest for driving while intoxicated begin to wonder what factors, beyond any actual beer, wine or liquor consumption, affect the blood-alcohol content (BAC) results from an Alcotest or other breathalyzer device. Naturally, as New Jersey DWI defense lawyers, we understand this area of the law quite well. But sadly, the science behind drunken driving arrests and convictions may not always be completely reliable.

Whether a motorist received a breathalyzer test at a mobile DWI unit or at a police department, the machines are very similar. These devices do not measure alcohol content in the blood itself, they are actually designed to detect chemical compounds containing the methyl group of molecules. Based on this methyl measurement, these devices produce a reading (as a percentage of blood-alcohol content) that is used to charge the motorist with driving while under the influence.

One of the weaknesses in this method of BAC measurement is that breathalyzers like the Alcotest machine make an assumption that any methyl molecule detected in a person’s breath is from alcohol. However, methyl molecules are not just found in alcoholic beverages, they exist in other substances.

The fact that the methyl group occurs elsewhere can be important knowledge for one segment of New Jersey’s driving public: Smokers. According to recent studies, breathalyzer machines may have a hard time distinguishing between the methyl molecules in alcohol and those found in acetaldehyde.

For readers who didn’t go to medical school or graduate with a degree in chemistry, acetaldehyde is a compound produced by the liver in small amounts as a by-product in the metabolism of alcohol. What came as a surprise to some researchers is the finding that acetaldehyde concentrations in the lungs of smokers was often many time greater than that found in the lungs of non-smokers.
Continue reading

June 2, 2010

Comatose Woman Dies following 2007 Fatal Drunk Driving Accident Caused by Ex-New Jersey Cop

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Having worked for many years as a municipal prosecutor I gained a healthy respect for the people serving in law enforcement. Now as a New Jersey DWI defense lawyer, I defend motorists accused of driving while intoxicated, arrested by some of those very same officers. While I admire the dedication of our police and their commitment to public safety, it gives me pause when I read about patrolmen and other individuals associated with law enforcement who flaunt the very laws they are sworn to uphold.

Being accused of drunken driving is nothing to be taken lightly, especially when fines and jail time are fairly heavy and the social stigma of being convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol can very often ruin reputations and business careers. The police, like other persons of authority, have a duty to be exemplary role models to the rest of society.

A recent news article reminds all of us that police officers do not always practice what they preach, and sometimes cause great harm when ignoring the law themselves. Based on reports, forty-year-old Ruth Zelaya died on March 24 as a result of “complications from a 2007 car crash that killed her 2-year-old son and left her in a comatose state until her recent passing.

May 16, 2010

Seton Hall Report Questions Accuracy of New Jersey Alcotest Breath-testing Machine Regarding DWI Cases

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Once again, the validity of breath-test measurements coming out of New Jersey’s Alcotest devices is being questioned, this time by Seton Hall University’s school of law. Titled “The Untestable Drunk Driving Test,” the report shines a spotlight on the reputed accuracy and reliability one of the most damning pieces of evidence used by the state in DWI cases against motorists accused of driving under the influence of alcohol.

Working with other DWI defense lawyers at my firm, we have a great deal of experience in this area. In fact, as a former municipal prosecutor I myself relied on the results for the blood-alcohol content (BAC) testing that law enforcement officers perform everyday on accused drunken driving offenders.

According to this latest report out of Seton Hall in South Orange, NJ, Alcotest maker Draeger AG & Company lobbied to have the machine’s source code classified as a trade secret. Because of this, there has apparently been no easy way to confirm the accuracy of the device. What this means, essentially, is that the state of New Jersey purchased a “black box” device that state police and other law enforcement agencies use regularly to arrest and charge drivers with drunk driving.

Because no independent group is allowed to buy and test the Alcotest device — apparently a Seton Hall University professor attempted to buy one from Drager, but was denied — scientific comparisons are next to impossible. Based on recent news reports, 20 people convicted of DWI have sued the state over the results of the Alcotest device. As a result, Drager agreed to allow outside companies to review the source code, but not the machine itself.

Reportedly, Draeger contracted Colorado-based SysTest Labs to review the device’s source code, while the plaintiffs used a New York-based company to analyze the code. The Seton Hall report claims that both companies determined the code was flawed, however, these third parties each reached different conclusions regarding the reliability of the machine.

SysTest said that despite the flaws the Alcotest machine would “reliably produce consistent test results.” This in itself is not a glowing endorsement, but the plaintiffs’ research firm, Base One, went one further by saying it found 24 “major defects,” nine of which would have a significant impact on the device’s testing results.
Continue reading