Breath Test Results

April 18, 2011

DWI News: Bus Driver Arrested on New Jersey Turnpike; Fails Sobriety Test, Charged with Drunken Driving

Speeding, weaving in and out of traffic, or running a stop sign are all ways that can get a driver killed, much less noticed by the police. While this kind of behavior can be interpreted in several different ways, law enforcement agencies tend to associate it with intoxication. In some cases they are right to do so. This is why a state trooper or local municipal patrolman will watch a potential drunken driving suspect for slurred speech, poor eye-hand coordination and other tell-tale signs of inebriation.

Here in Monmouth County, as in other areas across the Garden State, drunk driving is frowned upon by police and the courts. As New Jersey DWI defense attorneys, I and my colleagues are contacted frequently by people accused of driving under the influence of alcohol, prescription medication, and even controlled and dangerous substances (CDS) like cocaine and marijuana.

One thing all of us assume is that owners and operators of public and private transportation make certain that there drivers adhere to corporate rules and state and federal laws. Any commercial driver who is convicted of driving while intoxicated is likely to lose his or her job as a result, which would be a serious and life-changing event for someone in that field.

April 12, 2011

NJ Drunken Driving Arrest? Here’s Why You Might Need a New Jersey DWI Defense Lawyer

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Have you or a family member been arrested for drunk driving here in Monmouth County, or anywhere else in the Garden State? Whether you live in Union, Atlantic or Morris County, you may be asking yourself, “Why should I even consider hiring a drunk driving defense attorney? And, is it really worth it now that I’ve been charged with DWI?”

Maybe you were stopped for a minor traffic infraction and the officer ended up arresting you for driving while intoxicated. Perhaps you received a summons at a local drunk driving roadblock after having performed a number of field sobriety tests. Or maybe you got a ticket for being intoxicated while sitting in your parked car.

Whatever the situation, you should ask yourself some important questions. For instance, were you actually drunk? Maybe yes, maybe no. Was being charged with drunken driving actually warranted under the circumstances? Perhaps yes, or then again, maybe not. As with most other aspects of the law, not all drunken driving cases are completely open and shut.

As New Jersey DWI defense attorneys, I and my colleagues have counseled numerous clients who felt that they were unjustly accused. Although some may have broken the law, these individuals also understood the consequences and potential penalties associated with a DWI conviction. Wanting to improve the outcome of one’s DWI case is not so unusual.

We don’t worry so much about the people who seek us out, but we do share a concern for those motorists who choose not to speak with a qualified drunken driving defense lawyer. Some individuals believe that they deserved to be pulled over, or because the police have “positive” proof — via a breathalyzer or Alcotest machine — that it would be senseless to try and fight the charges. But this kind of thinking is just wrong. Everyone who is accused of breaking the law deserves to have their case heard in a court of law.

One of the main things that causes individuals to believe the state has solid evidence against them is embodied in the blood-alcohol content (BAC) breath or blood test results. But even with this kind of evidence in the hands of a prosecuting attorney, you need to be aware that “blowing” more than 0.08 percent BAC does not automatically mean you will be convicted for DWI. Never assume that because the breathalyzer registered a high BAC that you’re out of luck.
Continue reading

March 24, 2011

New Jersey Driver Arrested for DWI after Hitting Parked Car in Little Ferry

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Depending on the circumstances, a driver can occasionally be arrested for DWI yet not be physically able to provide police with a breath sample. In some cases, police will then take the suspect to a local hospital to have the person’s blood and urine sampled for evidence of drunken driving. As a New Jersey DWI and drug DUI defense lawyer, I and my colleagues have seen many such instances.

A news article not long ago showed what can happen when a driver allegedly operates a vehicle under the influence of alcohol. According to the report, a later afternoon call to the local police department described a possibly intoxicated driver who had moments earlier reportedly struck a parked car on Main Street in Little Ferry, NJ, then drove off.

The driver, who was allegedly operating a grey VW, was followed by the caller to a local apartment complex. Based on police reports, officers arrived at the complex in time to observe the suspect enter one of the apartment units. After knocking, the woman answered the door. Officers apparently asked the suspect if she had just been driving the VW parked out front, to which she answered in the affirmative.

The patrolmen inquired if the woman realized that she had been in an accident, and she reportedly stated that she had. She also stated, according to police reports, that she believed she only tapped her sideview mirror. According to the news report, officers had found the VW’s front passenger-side body panel had been heavily damaged.

During the interview, officers allegedly detected the odor of alcohol on the suspect’s breath. Police also reported that the woman appeared disoriented and that she was not making sense when she answered the patrolmen’s questions. As she walked away from the front door of her apartment, police stated that she appeared to be staggering and swaying.

Inside the apartment, police asked the suspect if she would submit to a sobriety test, to which she responded that she couldn’t due to mental and physical complications. The officer apparently felt it was unwise to have the woman attempt to complete any balance tests, so they placed her under arrest and took her to the local police department where she was charged her with DWI.
Continue reading

March 13, 2011

Judge in Atlantic County, NJ, Rules Drunken Driving Breath Test Machine Unreliable

by Jonathan F. Marshall

An Atlantic City judge recently overturned a DWI conviction when he found that only a certain type of thermometer probe should be used to determine the reliability breathalyzer devices. According to recent news reports, Superior Court Judge Max Baker’s decision could affect the results of numerous drunk driving cases in the Atlantic County area. Apparently, the New Jersey State Police, whose job it is to regulate the Alcotest breath test device, did not immediately say how many police departments in the county use the reportedly unreliable component.

As a New Jersey drunken driving defense lawyer, I and my colleagues are well versed in the law pertaining to drunk driving as well as drug DUI arrests. Each of our attorneys is also qualified in the operation and maintenance of the Alcotest machine cited in this news report.

Superior Court judge’s ruling could negate DWI arrests throughout the county, according to other area defense attorneys and municipal prosecutors. According to court records, the ruling come from an appeal by Emilio Rivera who was pulled over on New Year’s Eve, 2009, along the Garden State Parkway.

Rivera was arrested for drunk driving and taken into custody. Police eventually administered the Alcotest at the Bass River Barracks. The man’s case was initially heard in Galloway Township, were he was convicted on evidence presented by the prosecutor’s office. However, his attorney appealed on a number of issues, including the manufacturer of the temperature probe and the room where the defendant was tested for blood-alcohol content (BAC).

A key to the man’s appeal was the fact that in the New Jersey Supreme Court’s previous ruling stating that the Alcotest device could replace the Breathlyzer throughout the state, it named only one company as the approved manufacturer for the thermometer probe. Specifically, the Ertco-Hart digital measuring system is the one specified, however it has come to light that some police departments use a probe made by the Control Company.

Apparently, testimony from another case concerning the two probes showed that Control was the choice of probe mainly because it is cheaper — about $300 compared to $2,000 for the Ertco-Hart model, which also requires yearly recalibrations that can cost upward of $700. According to the news report, Control’s probe is replaced rather than recalibrated.
Continue reading

March 9, 2011

NJ Drug DUI Defense Update: Understanding the Difference between Drug DUI and DWI Charges

by Jonathan F. Marshall

I’ve said it here before, and most people understand that DWI arrests can occur almost anywhere, and almost any time. No matter where you live in the Garden State, be it Morris, Hudson, Mercer or Atlantic County, state police troopers and other local law enforcement officers have but little tolerance when it comes to drunken driving on the part of area residents, not to mention out-of-state drivers.

This lack of tolerance covers a range of offenses such as alcohol-related DWI and drug-related DUI, the latter of which includes prescription drugs and marijuana, not to mention seriously illegal drugs like cocaine and heroine. This last group comes under the heading of controlled dangerous substances, better known as CDS.

Being a New Jersey DWI defense lawyer, I offer a vast amount of experience in the defense of motorists accused of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated by beer, wine or other alcoholic beverages or impaired due to the affects of CDS-type drugs. It commonly accepted that police routinely will charge a driver with drunken driving when he or she is suspected of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID). These drugs can include but are not limited to narcotic, hallucinogenic and/or habit-forming substances.

To understand the process of charging a driver with drug DUI, it is also important to know that New Jersey law prohibits operating a motor vehicle by a person who is impaired by marijuana, cocaine, or other narcotics. This group also includes prescription medication such as morphine. For legal purposes, the standard of proof used to establish a narcotic-based DWI charge was established about five years ago in State v. Bealor. Moreover, State v. DiCarlo defines the term “narcotic” for the specific purpose of establishing a basis for driving while intoxicated charges here in the Garden State.
Continue reading

February 18, 2011

DWI Law Update: Field Sobriety Testing Procedures for New Jersey Motorists Suspected of Driving while Intoxicated

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Understanding what can occur during a routine traffic stop can be very useful for drivers who may have had some amount of beer, wine or hard liquor prior to getting behind the wheel of their car or truck. By learning the procedures used by police officers when facing a possible DWI suspect a motorist may be better prepared for the subsequent steps of a drunken driving arrest and possible conviction.

As a New Jersey DWI defense lawyer, I can say that nobody looks forward to a drunk driving conviction on their record. Yet, this is certainly a risk when any driver, regardless of past history, attempts to operate a motor vehicle after having consumed even a small amount of alcohol. And don’t forget that prescription medication has been known to cause impaired judgment as well, which explains why drug DUI arrests continue to make the headlines across the country.

As the saying goes, “Knowledge is power,” especially where the law is concerned. An arrest for DWI, drug DUI or even marijuana possession in a motor vehicle can be just the beginning of a long and costly process for many drivers. Regardless of the reasons — be it excessive alcohol consumption, a bad reaction to prescription meds, or the so-called cocaine hangover — being pulled over by a New Jersey state trooper or local police officer can be the beginning of the end to a previously clean driving record.

Before being charged with DWI or drug DUI, a motorist may not even be suspected of driving under the influence by the officer in charge. Still, policemen are trained to detect the telltale signs of drunken driving behavior, so the suspicion may already exist. However, for a DWI stop to be legal the officer must stop the motorist an actual traffic infraction, such as failure to signal a lane change or having a broken taillight. This kind of offense is usually the initial cause of traffic stop that could end up in an actual DWI arrest.

The well-known field sobriety test is an important tool employed by police officers all around the country to determine if a driver is possibly impaired due to alcohol or drug use. Failing to pass one or more of a variety of tests can become one of several pieces of evidence that a municipal prosecutor can present to the court as proof that a driver was impaired at the time of the initial traffic stop.
Continue reading

February 6, 2011

New Jersey Drunk Driving Arrests Follow Multiple Steps before a Final, Possible DWI Conviction

by Jonathan F. Marshall

It doesn’t matter where you live in the Garden State — Atlantic, Bergen, Monmouth, Passaic or even Ocean County — as a motorist there is always that possibility that you will be pulled over by the New Jersey State Police or a local patrolman for one of dozens of relatively minor traffic offenses. But an interesting fact is that nearly every DWI arrest begins with a routine traffic stop.

As a drunken driving defense lawyer, I and my colleagues have defended literally hundreds of individuals charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, prescription meds or even illicit drugs such as marijuana or cocaine. Being stopped for something as seemingly minor as a burned-out taillight can actually result in some motorists receiving a summons for drinking and driving.

Some people may not realize that for an arrest for drunken driving to be legal it must have been preceded by what state law defines as “reasonable suspicion.” In this case, the suspicion would be that the driver of vehicle has committed a traffic violation.

This requirement is based on a case known as New Jersey v. Carpentieri, in which the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that a police officer needs to have an “articulable and reasonable suspicion” that the driver of a vehicle has committed a violation of New Jersey traffic law before that officer can even consider pulling the suspect’s car or truck over.

Following the initial stop for the traffic offense, the patrolman must by law have probable cause prior to making any arrest and before having the driver submit to breathalyzer test. By probable cause the law states that the officer must have cause to believe that the motorist is operating his car or truck while under the influence of alcohol or other substance that may have caused impairment.

Please keep in mind that at no time during this early stage of a DWI arrest does a driver have the right to advice from counsel. Even an experienced DWI lawyer will be of absolutely no help at that particular point in time.
Continue reading

January 11, 2011

Arrested for Drunken Driving Over the Holidays? You Might Need a New Jersey DWI Defense Lawyer

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Now that 2011 has arrived, more than a few motorists probably awoke thinking about a drunk driving arrest or summons they may have had during the holidays. As a New Jersey DWI defense attorney, I understand how a carefree night out can end with drunk driving or prescription drug DUI. What many people do not realize is how often this scenario actually plays out, not only on the way home from a pub or bar, but even from a friendly cocktail party or year-end holiday celebration.

The question may drivers ask themselves after the fact is how can a lawyer really help me? Being pulled over and charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI) or driving under the influence (DUI) of legal or illegal drugs can sometimes seem like an open and closed case, even to the defendant. But every situation is different and a drunken driving defense attorney may be helpful. But only if you ask.

Although there is no plea bargaining in New Jersey when is comes to drunk driving and DUI offenses, the Garden State nonetheless has one of highest rates of successful DWI defense in the nation. In fact, as a former municipal prosecutor myself, I know that in New Jersey state prosecutors learn early on that it’s more difficult to prosecute a case if the accused motorist has retained a lawyer for his or her defense.

December 26, 2010

Multiple Convictions for Drunk Driving Can Make a New Jersey Driver’s Life More Difficult

by Jonathan F. Marshall

As Bergen, Ocean and Monmouth County attorneys who represent motorists accused of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or prescription drugs, we can heartily say that there are potentially harsh consequences for individuals convicted of multiple times for drunken driving or operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of prescription medicine or even illegal substances, such as marijuana and cocaine.

There is a strong argument for mounting a compelling defense for first-time DWI and DUI charges, if only because subsequent arrests and convictions present an even more costly and potentially life-altering consequences. Even so, second- and third-time offenders may still ask themselves the question, “Why do I need a drunk driving lawyer?”

When it comes to multiple convictions for driving while intoxicated, the impact on one’s lifestyle and relationships may be greatly affected. It’s no secret that second, third and subsequent DWI convictions can result in far more serious consequences than that of one’s first-time offense.

December 19, 2010

New Jersey Driver Gets 12 Years for Fatal Drunk Driving Accident

by Jonathan F. Marshall

A New Jersey woman was recently convicted for the 2007 DWI-related death of a South Brunswick college student. According to reports, 35-year-old Kimberly Green was sentenced in a Middlesex County courtroom to 12 years in prison for her part in the fatal drunken driving accident. Based on reports, the defendant received an eight-year sentence for the death of Kylie Pinheiro, plus another four years for the injuring of the victim’s cousin, Heather Pinheiro.

The court also sentenced Green to an additional four-year term for injuring another cousin of the victim, Melissa Pinheiro. That sentence is set to run concurrent with the other two. According to court records, Green will have to serve more than seven years before she can even hope to be eligible for parole.

As a New Jersey drunk driving defense attorney, I can say that adding a injury or fatal accident to a drunken driving arrest is very serious indeed. Drunk driving cases such as the one reported on here can land a driver in jail for many years, much less result in other penalties that can impact one’s future livelihood.