Prosecutions of motorists accused of driving while intoxicated can unfold in a number of different ways here in the Garden State. In situations where a driver is charged with operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol usually focus on whether or not the defendant was impaired by beer, wine, hard liquor of some other type of alcoholic beverage. Arrests made on the basis of having a blood-alcohol content (BAC) reading of 0.08 percent or more is typically referred to as a “per se” charge.
As New Jersey drunk driving defense attorneys, I and my legal team understands New Jersey’s DWI-DUI law, which can be unusual in several ways. First off, unlike many other states across the country, New Jersey doesn’t give accused DWI or drug DUI offenders the right to a jury trial. A motorist accused of driving while intoxicated in the Garden State is entitled only to a court trial, where a judge is the sole decider of guilt or innocence. Naturally, there are various advantages and disadvantages to this approach.
One important “advantage” for those defendants who are found guilty by a judge of DWI-DUI in New Jersey is that the guilty party has the right to an appeal, known in legal circles as a “de novo” appeal. In cases where the defendant loses his initial DWI case, the de novo appeal allows the appellant to bring his case before a county-level Superior Court judge, who will review the trial transcripts and listen to arguments from both the motorist’s lawyer and the state’s attorney.
Continue reading