Second Offense DWI

August 17, 2012

New Jersey Residents Split on Criminalizing DWI in the Garden State

While the New Jersey’s state police and local PDs run pretty heavy drunken driving patrols from time to time, here in New Jersey the laws on drunken driving treat a DWI as a vehicle violation or civil offense. Unlike other surrounding states, our has yet to criminalize the mere act of driving while intoxicated. Of course, things can get much more involved when property damage or personal injuries are involved, so there is a fine line that a DWI or drug DUI defendant must be aware of.

As New Jersey drunk driving defense lawyers, I and my team of experienced defense attorneys know full well that an arrest for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence is not the same as a conviction. When it comes being convicted of DWI, it would appear that a significant percentage of the public would prefer that even a first-time offender face the same penalties as any criminal. Others feel that lumping convicted DWI offenders in with common criminals is perhaps excessive.

A non-scientific poll conducted by the editors of Patch.com illustrated the divide between those who would criminalize drunken driving offenses and those who feel drivers need at least some leeway, especially when it comes to first-time offenses. Naturally, many people are swayed by the headlines of hundreds and even thousands of innocent people killed by drunken drivers across the nation every year. And as of last May, New Jersey lawmakers have begun to look into the possibility of creating legislation to keep those arrested for repeat DWI off the road at least until their case is heard in a court of law.
Continue reading

June 15, 2012

Rutherford, NJ, Motorist Charged with DWI after Hit-and-Run Arrest in Bergen County

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Drink and drive in the Garden State and one risks being caught and cited for DWI and possibly other traffic violations. Get behind the wheel after several drinks and cause an accident: the fines and potential liability could cost you big. But drive while intoxicated, cause a car or pedestrian accident, and then leave the scene of the crash? Anyone who finds themselves in such a situation should think twice about running from the law, but the best advice would probably be to not even take that first drink.

Hit-and-run can be a pretty serious charge, especially when injuries or fatalities are involved. Local and state police, not to mention our court system, are not very sympathetic to motorists who cause a traffic collision while legally intoxicated. As New Jersey drunken driving defense attorneys, I and my staff of experienced DWI lawyers know the law, and we are well aware of the stiff drunk driving penalties that can be levied against a defendant following a DWI or drug DUI conviction.

Not long ago, a motorist from Rutherford, NJ, was involved in a roadway collision over in Bergen County in the wake of which a woman from Kearny was left in critical condition. According to police, the alleged perpetrator left the scene of the accident after the man’s vehicle reportedly struck 44-year-old Zoila Diaz, who was crossing E. Passaic Ave. The collision took place later on a Tuesday night in April. News reports indicate that a person happening by after the crash noticed the woman lying in the middle of the street, not far from Meadow Rd.
Continue reading

March 6, 2012

Legal Defense Update: Not Every Drunken Driving Arrest in New Jersey Results in Similar Penalties Post-conviction

by Jonathan F. Marshall

A DWI is a DWI is a DWI, right? Well, not exactly. Here in the Garden State, people generally understand that an arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol can lead to severe monetary penalties. But what many motorists do not realize — until they have actually gone through the process of being tried for a DWI offense — is that drunken driving arrests come in varying degrees of severity, vis-à-vis penalties.

As New Jersey drunk driving defense attorneys, I and my staff of experienced DWI lawyers possess a deep understanding of the legal statutes that define this state’s anti-drunken driving law. Local and state police also know the law, too, and every day along our highways and byways, they make quite a concerted effort to secure arrests of individual drivers who, in their eyes, violate New Jersey’s strict DWI traffic laws.

For starters, every drunk driving defense lawyer in this state should know that driving while under the influence of beer, wine or hard liquor can result in severe penalties as defined in the New Jersey DWI statute, known in legal circles as N.J.S.A. 39:4-50. This set of criteria state the following in no uncertain terms:
Continue reading

February 2, 2012

Bergen County DWI Update: Drunken Driving Conviction Can Lead to Revoked NJ Driver’s License

by Jonathan F. Marshall

If there is one thing that most people need to live and work in our modern age, outside of food and lodging, it might be a valid driver’s license. From the day we receive our learner’s permit — and later a full-fledged license — we begin to value the freedom of movement that driving a car or truck provides. However, for many people, the state can revoke, suspend or otherwise withhold a motorist’s driving privileges for certain convicted offenses.

Whether one lives in Monmouth, Ocean or Sussex County, for those caught up in a drunken driving arrest it is not so far flung of a statement to suggest that a temporary, and sometimes long-term, loss of their New Jersey driver’s license could be in the offing depending on the nature of the charges and the driver’s history of DWI, drug DUI, or other impaired driving offenses.

Considering the freedom and independence that a license imparts to an individual, it’s hardly worth tempting fate with a drunk driving arrest, much less a potential conviction. Still, circumstances can arise leaving a driver in the unenviable position of losing his or her driver’s license based on a local court’s ruling following a guilty verdict or guilty plea regarding charges of driving while intoxicated, or operating a motor vehicle while impaired by prescription medication.
Continue reading

January 28, 2012

New Jersey Drunken Driving Defense Update: Driver’s License Suspension Possible following DWI or DUI Conviction

by Jonathan F. Marshall

It’s not surprising, with all the anti-drunken driving campaigns that target potentially impaired Garden State motorists every year, that New Jersey law enforcement agencies and our court system hold little love for drivers convicted of DWI or drug DUI. While use of illicit drugs, such as cocaine and marijuana, by some drivers is seen by police officers on a weekly basis, impaired driving as a result of alcohol consumption is likely much more common by the average citizen.

As New Jersey DWI defense lawyers, I and my staff of experienced drunken driving attorneys understand how quickly a driver can find him or herself on the receiving end of a DWI or DUI summons. When that day comes, it’s a good idea to consult with a qualified DWI attorney to better understand one’s options.

Naturally, it’s a given that being convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated or otherwise impaired by alcohol, prescription drugs or other illegal substances (also know as controlled dangerous substances (CDS), will likely include some serious sanctions — namely heavy fines and other monetary penalties. But in addition to these financially costly penalties, the courts also have the ability, in many cases, to include a license suspension as part of the list of penalties the defendant will have to bear.

From the standpoint of fees, in general, anyone who is convicted of drunken driving in New Jersey can face fines upward of $1,000 for a single instance and penalties (including surcharges to a driver’s insurance premiums) of possibly $4,000 to $5,000 or more over the course of three years. This includes numerous fees for the DWI Enforcement Fund, MVC Restoration Charge, potential out-patient counseling, Safe Neighborhood Fund, Violent Crime Compensation Board Fund, not to mention court costs.
Continue reading

January 1, 2012

NJ Legal Defense News: Penn. State Supreme Court Overturns Challenge to Ignition Interlock Law

by Jonathan F. Marshall

In many states, the Garden State included, ignition interlocks can be ordered installed in vehicles used by convicted drunken driving offenders as a way of keeping intoxicated drivers off the road. While some people oppose these types of laws, traffic safety and anti-drunk driving supporters maintain that mandatory ignition interlocks are a good thing.

As New Jersey DWI defense lawyers, my staff is well aware of the fines and penalties associated with a drunk driving conviction. In addition to court fees and punitive fines, motorists charged with driving while intoxicated by alcohol or prescription drugs (drug DUI) can also end up paying inflated car insurance premiums and even face jail time for multiple offenses.

One of the legal judgments that can come down from the bench following a DWI conviction is the mandatory installation of an ignition interlock onto a convicted drunk driver’s vehicle. The types of devices are designed to prevent the starting of a vehicle if the operator has a blood-alcohol content (BAC) exceeding a certain value. Akin to a mini breathalyzer, an ignition interlock device will disable a car or truck’s starting system if the unit detects alcohol on the driver’s breath.

A short time ago, Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court overturned a ruling that resulted from a legal challenge to that state’s law regarding the use of ignition interlock devices. Based on news reports, the ruling not only closed a loophole in state law, it also clarified the application of ignition interlocks in DWI cases.
Continue reading

November 12, 2011

NJ Legal Defense: Penalties Abound for Garden State Motorists Convicted of Driving While Intoxicated

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Being stopped by the police here in New Jersey for a traffic-related offense is not uncommon, nor out of the ordinary. With more than eight million residents and a population density of nearly 1,200 people per square mile, the odds of someone you know getting a traffic ticket in the next 12 months is actually quite high. What many people do not expect, when their “time” comes, is that they could also receive a summons for DWI as well.

The fact of the matter is, anyone who takes a drink prior to hitting the roads anywhere across the Garden State runs the risk of being arrested for drunken driving. Not that every driver who gets pulled over for a broken taillight or cracked windshield will be charged with driving while intoxicated, but the chance does exist. The odds of being accused of driving under the influence rises with the amount of beer, wine or hard liquor one may have consumed before getting behind the wheel.

As New Jersey DWI defense lawyers, I and my colleagues have extensive experience representing motorists who have been arrested for drunken driving, as well as drug DUI. Drug DUI, it should be explained, is similar to DWI, except it applies to an individual who is suspected of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of prescription medication or illicit drugs. Marijuana, cocaine and crystal meth come under the latter heading.

Whether you live in Hudson, Essex, Passaic or Bergen County, if you are convicted of DWI or drug DUI, severe penalties can be attached to that conviction. Someone who has been issued a traffic ticket or a summons for DWI, DUI or breath test refusal, is well advised to contact a qualified legal professional to better understand his or her rights, as well as familiarize themselves with the potential fines and fees associated with a drunken driving conviction.
Continue reading

June 19, 2011

Pennington Motorist Gets 3 Years for Injuring Motorcyclist in DWI-related Hit-and-Run Crash

by Jonathan F. Marshall

When it comes to defending motorists against charges of drinking and driving the subject of unintended consequences comes up from time to time. While no one who takes a drink at a restaurant, bar or family gathering expects to be stopped by the police when driving home, it is a distinct possibility. The same goes for those people who fail to realize the effects of certain prescription medications, which may cause drowsiness or reduced ability to control a motor vehicle on public roads.

As a New Jersey drunk driving attorney, I and my staff of experienced DWI defense lawyers understand how the seemingly minor act of having a drink with friends can precipitate a drunken driving arrest. (And for those who occasionally take a puff of weed or cannabis, these same holds true.) Regardless of whether you live or work in Middlesex, Hudson, Somerset or Union County, be aware that here in the Garden State the police and our courts maintain a dim view of driving while intoxicated, either by alcohol or prescribed medicines (drug DUI).

Touching on the topic of unintended consequences, we can only say a motorist who is involved in a DWI- or DUI-related traffic accident does not do themselves any favors by leaving the scene of the accident. Statistics will surely bear this out, but many hit-and-run drivers are eventually caught by police, which can only compound the original incident. This was apparently the case of a Pennington resident who was recently sentenced to three years in jail for a 2009 accident in Mercer County that put a motorcycle in the hospital with serious injuries.

According to news reports, 24-year-old Craig Brauer accepted a plea arrangement with the Mercer County prosecutor’s office. The deal reportedly included a guilty plea to 3rd degree aggravated assault by auto in exchange for a straight 4-year jail sentence. Originally charged with 2nd degree aggravated assault by auto and leaving the scene of an accident, Brauer could have gone away for up to 10 years.
Continue reading

April 6, 2011

NJ Supreme Court Says No to Using Breathlyzer Refusal Convictions as Proof of Prior Drunken Driving

by Jonathan F. Marshall

A 2009 appellate decision that looked to be a potential problem for individuals convicted of breath test refusal in New Jersey was reversed by the NJ Supreme Court earlier this year. Depending on the circumstances, a motorist who is pulled over for a traffic infraction can end up being cited for driving under the influence of alcohol. But, as many people already know, being arrested for drunken driving can also include a charge of breath test refusal if the motorist declines to provide a breath sample.

If the arresting officer suspects that the driver is drunk due to beer, wine or hard liquor consumption, he may request that the suspect take a breathalyzer test, also known as an Alcotest. As New Jersey DWI defense lawyers, I and my colleagues are certified in the maintenance and operation of the Alcotest device, which allows us to better argue the limitations of this machine and errors that can occur durin its use.

Should a driver refuse to take a breath test, or blood test, used by police to measure blood-alcohol content (BAC), the officer in charge is within his right to charge that person with breath test refusal. This has been a common course of action when a driver has chosen not to be tested. Until recently, the courts have not been allowed to treat refusal convictions as full-blown DWI convictions when considering a repeat driving while intoxicated offense. However the appellate case reviewed by the NJ Supreme Court had threatened to change all that.

According to court records, in the case of STATE v. CIANCAGLINI, the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously rejected the appellate court ruling that would have turned previous breath-test refusals into proof of prior drunken driving. Had the Supreme Court not rejected that earlier ruling, it could have meant that hundreds, and maybe thousands of motorists who had previously been convicted of refusing to take a breathalyzer test in New Jersey would have found they had what amounted to the equivalent of a prior drunken driving conviction on their record.
Continue reading

March 31, 2011

Monmouth County DWI Defense Update: Tips on Fighting a DWI Arrest in New Jersey — Part 2

by Jonathan F. Marshall

Picking up on our discussion previously regarding fighting a drunk driving charge, we’ve already talked about the possible causes of failing one or more of the standardized field sobriety tests that most police officers administer to allegedly drunk drivers in order to gauge their level of so-called drunkenness.

As a New Jersey DWI and drug DUI defense lawyer, I and my colleagues know the procedures that law enforcement departments train their officers to follow when arresting a motorist for driving under the influence of alcohol, prescription medication or illegal drugs. These tests are designed to evaluate a person’s level of inebriation, but they can also result in false assumptions.

In fact, an individual doesn’t need to be drunk to fail a field sobriety test, or FST. Many people who have had nothing alcoholic to drink can still struggle to pass FSTs under a variety of conditions. The takeaway here is that even if you ever struggled and possibly failed the FSTs, it can still be attributed to the setting and circumstances of the test, and not always because a person is intoxicated.